Sunday, June 17, 2012

Veritas in Caritate

Last week, I saw Ironman, and it confirmed to me that when it comes to seeing pain, I’m a wimp.  It’s not that I don’t have an acceptable pain tolerance myself, but throw up an image of someone getting the magnet that was keeping shrapnel from piercing his heart ripped out of his chest, and you can pretty much bet you will find me with my eyes closed and my hands reaching longingly for the mute button.

The Immaculate Heart of Mary
This is not all that abnormal. Many people hate seeing others in pain—some have even not been desensitized to it.  But, fear not, this is not another Catholic jeremiad bemoaning the moral decline of our society.  See, I seem to be an abnormality with my reaction to others’ pain.  But the anomaly goes deeper than that.  I’m not only uncomfortable about people being hurt physically, but also when they’re hurt spiritually.

You might ask what this means.  Well, as a Catholic, I believe in a soul.  I also believe in this pesky little thing called “objective morality,” which basically means that every time you do something wrong, you are tearing your soul kicking and screaming further from God.  And that’s no better for the soul than Tony Stark‘s chest magnet being ripped out is for his heart.

In practice, that means that watching my friends do something morally wrong is the spiritual equivalent of watching them cut themselves.  No wonder I get so uncomfortable at frat parties.

Of course, when someone’s cutting himself, the proper response isn’t to threaten him with the fires of Hell.  It’s not the time to lecture him about the sanctity of the body, and how God is angered by the desecration of His temple. The person who cuts himself is broken, and in need of healing, and so the proper response is love.  And love is not driven by fear, but is patient and kind.  And it’s love that conquers all.  Sure, at some point the “that wasn’t okay” conversation should probably happen, and this can serve an important point for accountability.  However, having that conversation at the wrong point in time not only doesn’t help, but can undo progress that had been made.   

Jesus and the Woman Taken in Adultery
Gustave Doré 
So me striding into Shooters during alumni weekend with a sign announcing, “Hell awaits you! Repent!” is probably not quite the Christian way.  Sure, the Catholic who goes to a frat party and sees some of the partygoers taking a knife to their soul perhaps should feel uncomfortable about it, just as we all feel uncomfortable about self-mutilation.  However, the to inflate ourselves and self-righteously condemn so we can distance ourselves from the messiness that comes with sitting at table with sinners breaks Jesus’ examples just as the sins they themselves commit.

After all, many of those same partygoers simply disagree with Catholic morality. Some have even thought much deeper about it than the Catholics who want to condemn them have.  I personally find getting drunk to be probably morally questionable, and I find a faithful homosexual relation to be probably not.  Many Catholics probably disagree with me on one or both counts.  But I promise you screaming Leviticus 18:22 at me will change my mind no more than me going to LDOC yelling about Ephesians 5:18 would stop the Catholics there.  I’ve thought quite deeply about these issues, and if your first response is to tell me which are my sins rather than finding the Christ within me, perhaps your priorities are misplaced.  

Once we have a mutual understanding in love, which bears all things and endures all things, then we can work to find the truth.

2 comments:

  1. I love this! It really resonated with an experience I had last weekend. (I understand that this is an example you most likely won't like, but I hope you look for the Christ in me instead!)

    Last weekend I volunteered at a Women's Health Clinic that provides abortions in order to protect patients from protestors. This clinic provides gynecological exams, pre-natal care and even births babies as well. I was horrified that no matter what choice they made, these women were being hounded by pictures of miscarried fetuses (these pictures are never of aborted fetuses, but typically miscarriages) with obscene and graphic comparisons to the Holocaust and lynching. I knew these women needed a good dose of Christian love.

    I intentionally started a conversation with another volunteer who self-identifies as Presbyterian about where I should to go to church the following day to see how the protestor reacted. I thought his head might explode from the possibility that we might be Christians unaware that we were certainly going to hell for personally performing abortions (read: we were not) and still bothering to go to Church. I may be writing my own blog post about this experience. We'll see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your story! It's a perfect example of the kind of thing I'm talking about. I don't mean to say that love is never tough love, but that tough love has its places. I have to wonder if that place being outside clinics yelling at people you've never met, the morality of abortion aside. After all, what is the goal of the protesting? As you point out, it's not even like it's reasoned discourse, for which perhaps there's an argument. The point seems to use shame and guilt to bludgeon others' consciences into submission, and that certainly doesn't feel very Christian.

      Abortion is a tough issue, and it really boils down to a battle over definitions: when does life begin? I think one could make the case that that particular question is outside the scope of the Church's authority over faith and morals (of course, one could make the opposite case...sometimes it's hard to tell what exactly "faith and morals" encompass). But, at the same time, it's not like science answers a question about definitions, either. So if we say that the definition of life is outside the scope of the Church, it raises the interesting question of where do we turn for the answer?

      Delete