In the famous story of the healing of the paralytic in Luke 5:17-26, a group of men cut a hole through the roof to lower a paralytic in to see Jesus. “Seeing their faith,” Jesus says “saying the paralytic’s sins are forgiven, Jesus is accused of blaspheming—for only God can forgive sins. In response, he asks, “Which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say ‘Rise and walk’?” He then proves his point that “the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins” by telling the paralytic to pick up his stretcher and go home—which the former-paralytic promptly does.
This story in Luke 5 illuminates two related aspects of the Church: its ability to effectively intercede for us for God’s forgiveness, and the efficacy of those intercessions even despite its imperfections.
This message of intercession is revealed after carefully probing of Jesus’ words in verse 20. He says, “When he saw their faith” Jesus says “your sins are forgiven.” (5:20) Because in English, “your” is can be either singular and plural, the text is unclear to whom Jesus refers to—the paralytic, his friends, or all of them. Fortunately, Spanish is more precise in this matter, and the text reads ,“Al ver su fe, Jesús le dijo: 'Hombre, tus pecados te son perdonados.'” (Luca 5:20) First, Jesus refers specifically to “Hombre” (man) singular, not “hombres” (men) plural. Second, Jesus says “Tus pecados—” and “tus” is used to address a single person, not a group.
So why does this rather mundane linguistic analysis matter? It matters because it means that after seeing “their faith—” the faith of the men who brought the paralytic, Jesus forgives the sin of someone totally different. Not only is this intercessory prayer at its finest, but it opens the door both for the forgiveness through intercessory prayer—even for those who do not have the wherewithal to ask for forgiveness for themselves. Perhaps the application to those who willingly reject God’s proffered grace is arguable, but this result is really extremely important if we care about those who may not have the mental capacity to ask God for forgiveness, such as young children or the mentally disabled.
The second interesting point is that in response to faith, Jesus’ first act wasn’t to simply fix the worldly problems of the paralytic, but to forgive the paralytic’s sins. In fact, it seems Jesus only reluctantly healed the paralytic with the goal of proving that he could forgive sins. At the time, the Jews believe that physical disability and illness was God’s punishment for one’s own sin or the sins of one’s parents. To the Jews, then, causing the paralytic to walk was not merely sending an unrelated message that would basically amount to, “See, see? I am powerful. Now do you believe what I say?” But, rather, in keying into the directly related message forgiveness of sins, it was an unmistakable and irrefutable sign of Jesus’ authority over sin to the Jews of the time.
In his actions, Jesus demonstrates that what is important—grace and salvation—are often not accompanied by visible signs. Indeed, the fact that he only did so in the face of doubt perhaps indicates they shouldn’t be. Yet, don’t we constantly demand signs of our Church? We might not demanded the same miracles the Jews did 2000 years ago, but when we see a priest, Bishop, Cardinal, or Pope, not visibly demonstrating our vision of godliness, we presume God is not present, and the legitimacy of the Church is destroyed. Just as the Jews did 2000 years ago, we demand our own “modern” sign of God’s presence, and when it isn’t forthcoming, we echo the scribes and the Pharisees and say, “Who is this who speaks blasphemies?” (5:21).
Of course, God understands that we are just as human as those who doubted him 2000 years ago, so God sends us the sign of a (soon to be) saint like Mother Theresa every once in a while to remind us that His Church is indeed graced with His presence. But, just as Jesus’ original forgiveness of the paralytic was not dependent on the accompanying physical sign, neither is the grace God dispenses through the Church, nor our faith dependent on our believing in the holiness of any individual member of the clergy. This is why we pray every Sunday before the Eucharist, “Look not on our sins, but on the faith of your Church.” Just as the faith of the paralytics friends cleansed the sins of the paralytic, the faith of our Church cleanses ours—no matter if the signs we are hoping to see aren’t there every time.
A practicing Catholic (with apologies to James Carroll) in Law School asking questions and trying to figure out a better answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything than 42.
Showing posts with label forgiveness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label forgiveness. Show all posts
Monday, February 18, 2013
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Reconciling Confession
Note: This post is adapted from a talk I gave
several years ago at a retreat. Every time I go to
Confession, I sit in the pews, trying to convince myself that I’m miserable
because I’m examining the darkest corners of my conscience and should be
miserable because of what a horrible sinner I am, and not at all because my
mind is wandering while asking myself why I came here.
We confess to our sinfulness every Mass in the penitential rite. We admit, “I am not worthy to receive you” every consecration. So why do we have to go sit down in a formalized one-on-one with a priest. What’s so different about the Sacrament? Couldn’t God just give us the grace at Mass? And He does! He forgives venial sins every time we take the Eucharist. So why does the Church say we should go to confession every month? I’d like to think the Church doesn’t assume I commit a mortal sin each and every month.
During Reconciliation, I’m unavoidably alone with God. It’s me and Him. I can’t keep my sins locked away inside, and saying them aloud makes them somehow more real. But no longer do I have everyone else around me so I can say, “at least I don’t do that.“ No one else can tell me it’s all okay, because “we’re all human, after all.” No one’s there to justify and give a dozen reasons why it’s not my fault. It’s me and Him.
And when I look up and see Him on the cross, my justifications can only fall silent. What am I going to say—he’s asking too much?
Paul writes in 2 Corinthians, “That I might not become too elated, a thorn in my flesh was given to me, an angel of Satan, to beat me, to keep me from being too elated. Three times I begged the Lord about this, that it might leave me, but He said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for power is made perfect in weakness.’ “
In confession, we confront our sins, our weaknesses. We have no strength to fight this battle. We must face the countercultural fact that without God, we are nothing. It is to God’s glory that He turns even our sin—our intentional rejection of Him—to an expression of humility, of faith, and of love. And that’s why I go to confession. It is in confession that His glory is revealed in a personal love too powerful to imagine. A love that can transcend my brokenness and my weakness. A love that can conquer, and will make me whole.
No wonder, when I leave, I always know I’ll be back.
We confess to our sinfulness every Mass in the penitential rite. We admit, “I am not worthy to receive you” every consecration. So why do we have to go sit down in a formalized one-on-one with a priest. What’s so different about the Sacrament? Couldn’t God just give us the grace at Mass? And He does! He forgives venial sins every time we take the Eucharist. So why does the Church say we should go to confession every month? I’d like to think the Church doesn’t assume I commit a mortal sin each and every month.
During Reconciliation, I’m unavoidably alone with God. It’s me and Him. I can’t keep my sins locked away inside, and saying them aloud makes them somehow more real. But no longer do I have everyone else around me so I can say, “at least I don’t do that.“ No one else can tell me it’s all okay, because “we’re all human, after all.” No one’s there to justify and give a dozen reasons why it’s not my fault. It’s me and Him.
And when I look up and see Him on the cross, my justifications can only fall silent. What am I going to say—he’s asking too much?
Paul writes in 2 Corinthians, “That I might not become too elated, a thorn in my flesh was given to me, an angel of Satan, to beat me, to keep me from being too elated. Three times I begged the Lord about this, that it might leave me, but He said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for power is made perfect in weakness.’ “
In confession, we confront our sins, our weaknesses. We have no strength to fight this battle. We must face the countercultural fact that without God, we are nothing. It is to God’s glory that He turns even our sin—our intentional rejection of Him—to an expression of humility, of faith, and of love. And that’s why I go to confession. It is in confession that His glory is revealed in a personal love too powerful to imagine. A love that can transcend my brokenness and my weakness. A love that can conquer, and will make me whole.
No wonder, when I leave, I always know I’ll be back.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)